Monday, December 28, 2015

Human Gene Editing (from 2015)

The international Summit on Human Gene Editing wrapped up this week in Washington with scientists from all over the world debating where to draw the line on human DNA editing. Changing our DNA so that we can never get certain diseases like leukemia. Is this discovery like genetically modifying our foods a helpful discovery to human well-being? What is the wisdom of this possible action with the human genome?

Hilarion: long-term we see this will eventually lead no matter which decision is made, which direction it goes and so on, in the direction we have just spoken of. Where it overturns this disease hypothesis and eventually deeper understanding by applying the scientific method to it will show up. In the meantime, there will be much more understanding about this and many areas that don't fit together and can only be explained by a larger hypothesis.


In the short-term as these things are developed it is going to create all kinds of problems and as we have spoken about before the karma associated with this relates to experiments of similar nature, though done for different reasons, in ancient Atlantis when animals and humans were interbred and various genetic manipulations as a result were those which gave rise to a great deal of suffering, pain and difficulty. Some of the same individuals are involved in this to clear their karma, or understand it in a new way and for this your understanding of this can be helpful. As you send them a sense of forgiveness or love or a way in which they can better understand this for themselves. 


But, it is very unlikely given the importance of overturning these aspects of the disease model that guides and helpers or the collective consciousness are going to allow any such scientist to get a new job, to give it up, to go in an entirely different direction. It will be continued looking into this by many.


Now, there are obvious problems with this in working out various ways in which genetics has profound effects on plant life and ways in which it has provided profit for those corporations involved in gene manipulation. There will be a continued push in such direction but is this a problem of genetic manipulation or of profit? As long as there is the sense of scarcity or those who need power over others then of course, further opportunity to exploit even impure science, science with only some successes and not others, as long as it makes money will continue.


So, our judgment on it or yours has little effect on such individuals. But, what does have effect is when you ask the deeper question, when you're willing to ask the right question for yourself perhaps this adds an energy, a vibration, so that others ask and here we would call on Dr. Phil to ask the geneticist, “how is it working for you?” Because in this way they recognize that it may perhaps bring profit it may also bring great pain, great struggles, great difficulty and in some cases side effects and unforeseen consequences that bring them back to re-examine the underlying theories of disease themselves.


December 21, 2015

Saturday, March 21, 2015

GMO's

Is there anything you would like to say about GMO’s?

Hilarion: there has been a concerted effort on the part of those in research laboratories to answer the question in a very final way and those companies involved in producing these substances know this is putting them in an interesting position karmically. They know the harm they are doing, they know of the tumors in laboratory animals, they know of the reduction in life span, they know of the digestive problems, and heart problems and other mutations and other difficulties that either the GMO’s themselves or the pesticides that are increased in their widespread utilization, they can now be used even more because the GMO plants are resistant to them. Therefore, providing more of these substances into people.

This becomes a very difficult area to understand, similar to Ebola, similar to AIDS as it was originally introduced, similar to all of these things that some might consider conspiracies and would find it very difficult to find the “smoking gun,” so to speak. (A poor term when you really think about it). But, in other words the proof that these things are actually going on in these laboratories and eventually it will come out and if nothing else such experiments will be replicated as some already have and be widely publicized, which they have not.

The result of this will be a deeper understanding of the true aim and intent of the corporations involved in these and other substances. Addiction is a part of it because you will become more addicted to pharmaceutical drugs which can cure you of your ills. But, also to the substances themselves and we see that ultimately the use of genetically modified substances for the specific intent of reducing health has this agenda associated with it, of that in which reduced health is beneficial. Bringing more money into the pockets of those involved, more sales of goods in which addiction to them is possible and so on and so forth.

This is of course one of the short-lived phenomena we have spoken of but this is not that which by the new wave of energy moving through will be obliterated. But, rather it will come through your deeper research, publishing of what you learn about, sharing the information, making it known and more and more widespread.

What is unusual about this is a lot of this has already taken place in other countries and it is in USA more than others that a sort of veil of secrecy, a sort of genetically modified curtain like the iron curtain of the Soviet Union has descended. It is of course based on the idea that through simple action and every individual state the legislation of the labeling has been prevented. But, no such activities exist in Europe and many in Europe are aware of this and are quire aware that it is the encroachment of these corporations with the deliberate attempt to reduce health that is their underlying idea.

Therefore, if you can forgive these people, if you can help them find their own identity by asking yourself such questions as,” who or what am I really?" and sharing this. It is possible this will shift in some individuals. In the meantime, political action, sharing about the research as it comes out, letting people know about this and of course in every state, as several will come up in the November election, where it can be pushed forward to bring labeling in, a neutral answer that you will usually find even those in favor of genetically modified foods will agree: that it is fine to label them, that there is no problem with this. It is the companies themselves that prevent this for being labeled for one simple reason: once it is labeled, the moment the research does come out, people will stop buying those products.

http://hilarion.com/fall14.html